• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Snitching

Criminal Informant Law, Policy, and Research

  • Home
  • About
  • Litigation
  • Legislation
  • Families & Youth
  • Blog
  • Resources & Scholarship

Blog

Appearing in Baltimore this weekend

February 18, 2010 by Alexandra Natapoff

I’ll be giving an author talk at the Enoch Pratt Central Library in Baltimore this Sunday, Feb. 21, at 2:00 p.m.; I’ll also be signing books at the Barnes & Noble at the Inner Habor on Saturday, Feb. 20, from 3:00-5:00 p.m.

Filed Under: Book events/media

Gregory Taylor exonerated by North Carolina innocence commission

February 18, 2010 by Alexandra Natapoff

The North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission declared yesterday that Gregory Taylor was wrongfully convicted of murder, 17 years ago, based on a combination of undisclosed forensic evidence, flawed eyewitness testimony, and a jailhouse snitch. L.A. Times story here; see also here for details of the hearing. North Carolina is the only state to have created a governmental commission that directly reviews post-conviction innocence claims, although other states are considering it given the large number of exonerations in recent years. Several states (e.g. California, Texas, Illinois, Wisconsin) have commissions to review the systemic sources of wrongful convictions and to propose reforms. See previous post.

Filed Under: Forensics, Innocence, Jailhouse Informants

Another wrongful conviction in the making?

February 17, 2010 by Alexandra Natapoff

The Pacific Northwest Inlander just published this story, entitled Reasonable Doubt, about the recent robbery convictions of Tyler Gassman, Paul Statler, and Robert Larson. The sole evidence against the young defendants was the testimony of Matt Dunham, a confessed drug dealer and robber himself, who named Gassman and the two others as accomplices in a series of unsolved robberies. In exchange for his testimony, Dunham received a light sentence for his own robbery charge–18 months in a juvenile facility; by contrast, Gassman received 25 years. Two weeks after the verdict, Dunham’s accomplice, Anthony Kongchunji, came forward and confessed that he and Dunham had conspired to pin the unsolved crimes on Gassman and the others in order to get deals for themselves, their friends, and relatives. The trial court denied the defendants’ motion for a new trial, and the case is currently on appeal.

Filed Under: Innocence, Reliability

“Used, Abused and Tossed”: informants and immigration

February 15, 2010 by Alexandra Natapoff

Here’s part 3 of the NPR series on informants–this one focuses on how ICE sometimes uses non-citizens as informants and then lets them be deported once they are no longer useful: Retired Drug Informant Says He Was Burned (NPR), and Informants can greatly aid US authories but still face deportation (LA Times). Deportation poses special dangers to informants, who may be killed upon returning to their home countries, in much the same way that domestic informants face special dangers in local jails and prisons or even on the streets. The government is under little legal obligation to protect its sources. For example, after he gave his FBI handler a tip, Charles Shuler was shot and paralyzed because the FBI blew his cover. A court dismissed Shuler’s lawsuit, ruling that the FBI did not owe him protection. Stories like these reflect the more general phenomenon that informants who lack counsel, education, or other resources are often vulnerable to official exploitation.

Filed Under: Dynamics of Snitching, Immigration, Incentives & Payments, Threats to Informants

NPR series on “House of Death” informant

February 11, 2010 by Alexandra Natapoff

NPR is running a three-part series on the federal informant connected to the so-called House of Death murders that occurred six years ago in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico: The Case of a Confidential Informant Gone Wrong. For additional coverage of this story, see this 2007 Dallas Observer feature entitled House of Death. The informant, who was known as “Lalo” to his handlers, was working for the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) even as he participated in drug-cartel-ordered executions. Top ICE officials deny knowledge of the murders and claim that “rogue agents” failed to follow guidelines, while Lalo’s handler, Agent Raul Bencomo, says his supervisors knew about the killings. According to NPR, ICE withheld information about Lalo’s role in the murders from the DEA and from Mexican officials. Former DEA Special Agent Phil Jordan describes the Lalo case as a disaster in which every rule was broken.

Even if the man was John Gotti in his prime, you do not allow an informant to run the investigation; you do not let the informant commit felonies, to commit murder. In my mind, he was given a license to kill.

Jordan testified in the now-defunct civil suit against ICE brought by relatives of the slain House of Death victims, two of whom were U.S. residents.
Lalo has been in federal custody for five years. Now that the case against Lalo’s target is over, ICE is trying to deport him back to Mexico.

Filed Under: Dynamics of Snitching, Immigration, Informant Crime, International, News Stories, Threats to Informants

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 53
  • Go to page 54
  • Go to page 55
  • Go to page 56
  • Go to page 57
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 66
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The death of teenager LeBron Gaither
  • U.S. breaks a high-stakes informant deal
  • Snitch deals in Kilmar Abrego Garcia case
  • U.S. seeks to deport gang informant back to El Salvador
  • Using children as informants

Categories

open all | close all

Archives

open all | close all

Copyright © 2025 Alexandra Natapoff · Log in · RSS on follow.it